Debian Bug report logs - #1092093
RFS: turtle/0.13-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Reply or subscribe to this bug.

Display info messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Philipp Unger <philipp.unger.1988@gmail.com>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RFS: turtle/0.11-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 13:31:42 +0100

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "turtle":

* Package name : turtle
Version : 0.11-1
Upstream contact : Philipp Unger <philipp.unger.1988@gmail.com>
* URL : https://gitlab.gnome.org/philippun1/turtle
* License : GPL-3+
* Vcs : https://gitlab.gnome.org/philippun1/turtle
Section : vcs

The source builds the following binary packages:

python3-turtlevcs - Dialogs for easier version control (Python 3)
turtle-cli - Command line interface for turtle
turtle-nautilus - Nautilus extension for turtle

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/turtle/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/turtle/turtle_0.11-1.dsc

Changes for the initial release:

turtle (0.11-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release.

Regards,

Philipp Unger

Message #10 received at 1092093@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Phil Wyett <philip.wyett@kathenas.org>

To: 1092093@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 1092093-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFS: turtle/0.11-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 15:07:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Control: tags -1 +moreinfo

Philipp,

Preamble...

Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to
the Debian project.

This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to
improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no
obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon
information provided in the review.

Review...

1. Build:

  * pbuilder [1]: Good
  * sbuild [2]: Good

2. Lintian [3]: Issue

Running lintian...
N:
W: turtle source: inconsistent-appstream-metadata-license
data/de.philippun1.turtle.metainfo.xml (cc0-1.0 != gpl-3+) [debian/copyright]
N: 
N:   The specified AppStream metadata file specifies a metadata_license field
N:   but this does not match its entry (possibly via the Files: * stanza) in
N:   debian/copyright.
N: 
N:   Please refer to https://wiki.debian.org/AppStream/Guidelines,
N:   https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/, and
N:  
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Metadata.html#tag-metadata_license
N:   for details.
N: 
N:   Visibility: warning
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: debian/copyright/dep5
N: 
N:
W: python3-turtlevcs: initial-upload-closes-no-bugs [usr/share/doc/python3-
turtlevcs/changelog.Debian.gz:1]
N: 
N:   This package appears to be the first packaging of a new upstream software
N:   package (there is only one changelog entry and the Debian revision is 1),
N:   but it does not close any bugs. The initial upload of a new package should
N:   close the corresponding ITP bug for that package.
N:   
N:   This warning can be ignored if the package is not intended for Debian or
N:   if it is a split of an existing Debian package.
N: 
N:   Please refer to New packages (Section 5.1) in the Debian Developer's
N:   Reference for details.
N: 
N:   Visibility: warning
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: debian/changelog
N:   Renamed from: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
N: 
N:
W: turtle-cli: initial-upload-closes-no-bugs [usr/share/doc/turtle-
cli/changelog.Debian.gz:1]
N:
W: turtle-nautilus: initial-upload-closes-no-bugs [usr/share/doc/turtle-
nautilus/changelog.Debian.gz:1]
N:
W: python3-turtlevcs: maintainer-script-ignores-errors [postinst]
N: 
N:   The maintainer script doesn't seem to set the -e flag which ensures that
N:   the script's execution is aborted when any executed command fails.
N: 
N:   Please refer to Scripts (Section 10.4) in the Debian Policy Manual for
N:   details.
N: 
N:   Visibility: warning
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: scripts
N: 
N:
W: python3-turtlevcs: maintainer-script-ignores-errors [postrm]
N:
W: turtle-cli: no-manual-page [usr/bin/turtle_cli]
N: 
N:   Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin or /usr/games should have
N:   a manual page
N:   
N:   Note that though the man program has the capability to check for several
N:   program names in the NAMES section, each of these programs should have its
N:   own manual page (a symbolic link to the appropriate manual page is
N:   sufficient) because other manual page viewers such as xman or tkman don't
N:   support this.
N:   
N:   If the name of the manual page differs from the binary by case, man may be
N:   able to find it anyway; however, it is still best practice to match the
N:   exact capitalization of the executable in the manual page.
N:   
N:   If the manual pages are provided by another package on which this package
N:   depends, Lintian may not be able to determine that manual pages are
N:   available. In this case, after confirming that all binaries do have manual
N:   pages after this package and its dependencies are installed, please add a
N:   Lintian override.
N: 
N:   Please refer to Manual pages (Section 12.1) in the Debian Policy Manual
N:   for details.
N: 
N:   Visibility: warning
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: documentation/manual
N:   Renamed from: binary-without-manpage
N: 
N:
W: turtle-cli: no-manual-page [usr/bin/turtle_service]
N:
I: python3-turtlevcs: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
N: 
N:   The extended description (the lines after the first line of the
N:   "Description:" field) is only one or two lines long. The extended
N:   description should provide a user with enough information to decide
N:   whether they want to install this package, what it contains, and how it
N:   compares to similar packages. One or two lines is normally not enough to
N:   do this.
N: 
N:   Please refer to General guidelines for package descriptions (Section
N:   6.2.1) in the Debian Developer's Reference and The long description
N:   (Section 6.2.3) in the Debian Developer's Reference for details.
N: 
N:   Visibility: info
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: fields/description
N: 
N:
I: turtle-cli: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
N:
I: turtle-nautilus: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
N:
I: turtle source: installable-field-mirrors-source (in section for turtle-cli)
Section [debian/control:36]
N: 
N:   The named field for an installation package in debian/control has the same
N:   value as the one inherited from the source paragraph.
N:   
N:   In the interest of shorter and clearer files, you may wish to take
N:   advantage of the inheritance rules. This field is redundant.
N: 
N:   Visibility: info
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: debian/control/field/redundant
N:   Renamed from: binary-control-field-duplicates-source
N: 
N:
I: turtle source: installable-field-mirrors-source (in section for turtle-
nautilus) Section [debian/control:46]
N:
I: python3-turtlevcs: wrong-section-according-to-package-name vcs => python
N: 
N:   This package has a name suggesting that it belongs to a section other than
N:   the one it is currently categorized in.
N: 
N:   Visibility: info
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: fields/section
N: 
N:
P: python3-turtlevcs: repeated-path-segment dialogs [usr/lib/python3/dist-
packages/turtlevcs/dialogs/ui/dialogs/]
N: 
N:   The file is installed into a location that repeats the given path segment.
N:   An example would be /usr/lib/lib or /usr/share/myprogram/share.
N:   
N:   More often than not this is unintended.
N: 
N:   Please refer to Bug#950052 and Bug#950027 for details.
N: 
N:   Visibility: pedantic
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: files/hierarchy/path-segments
N: 
N:
N: masked by screen python/egg/metadata
M: python3-turtlevcs: package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc
[usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/turtlevcs-0.11.egg-info/dependency_links.txt]
N: 
N:   This package ships a documentation file outside /usr/share/doc
N:   Documentation files are normally installed inside /usr/share/doc.
N:   
N:   If this file doesn't describe the contents or purpose of the directory it
N:   is in, please consider moving this file to /usr/share/doc/ or maybe even
N:   removing it. If this file does describe the contents or purpose of the
N:   directory it is in, please add a lintian override.
N: 
N:   Visibility: info
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: documentation
N: 
N:   Screen: python/egg/metadata
N:     Advocates: "Scott Kitterman" <debian@kitterman.com>
N:     Reason: The folders XXX.dist-info/ and XXX.egg-info/ hold metadata for
N:             Python modules. Those files are not documentation even though
N:             some of their names carry the .txt file extension.
N:             
N:             Python modules can be both public and private.
N:             
N:             Read more in
N:            
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0427/#the-dist-info-directory,
N:             https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0376/#id16,
N:             https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0610/,
N:             https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0639/,
N:            
https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/deprecated/python_eggs.html,
N:             and Bug#1003913.
N: 
N:
N: masked by screen python/egg/metadata
M: python3-turtlevcs: package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc
[usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/turtlevcs-0.11.egg-info/requires.txt]
N:
N: masked by screen python/egg/metadata
M: python3-turtlevcs: package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc
[usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/turtlevcs-0.11.egg-info/top_level.txt]

E: Lintian run failed (runtime error)

3. Licenses [4]: See 2.

4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good

5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc]: Good

6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good

7. Install [No previous installs]: Not performed at this time

8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Not performed at this time.

Additonal...

A. 'd/changelog' entry should be closing an ITP bug for new package.

Summary...

I believe turtle is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the
contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues.

Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the
'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report.

Please try the below on your packages...

[1] pbuilder:

  * Command: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc
  * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto.
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks

[2] sbuild:

  * Command: sbuild <PACKAGE>.dsc
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild

[3] lintian:

  * Command: lintian --display-info --verbose --fail-on error --info --pedantic
--show-overrides (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different
results, so be thorough.
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian

[4] lrc:

  * Command: lrc
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon

  Note: Please report false positives as bug reports against 'licenserecon'.

[5] reprotest

  * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto-
build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild
  * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
  
Regards

Phil

-- 

Donations...

Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

--

"I play the game for the game’s own sake"

Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans

--

Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas

Website: https://kathenas.org

Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg

Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg

--

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 1092093@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Philipp Unger <philipp.unger.1988@gmail.com>

To: 1092093@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Re: RFS: turtle/0.11-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:47:30 +0100

Hi Phil,

thanks a lot for your review and your input, that helped me a lot.

I ran all the steps and I have addressed the mentioned issues, some 
things are still left though:

- the txt files in the egg-info folder still exist
- piuparts fails, but the leftover files seem not to be turtle package 
related
- "Package closes bugs in a wrong way" in the changelog

There is now a new upstream release 0.11.1 being used, so the title of 
this bug report no longer matches. I hope this is fine.

Best regards,
Philipp

Message #27 received at 1092093@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Phil Wyett <philip.wyett@kathenas.org>

To: 1092093@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 1092093-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Re: RFS: turtle/0.11-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:17:30 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:47:30 +0100 Philipp Unger <philipp.unger.1988@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> 
> thanks a lot for your review and your input, that helped me a lot.
> 
> I ran all the steps and I have addressed the mentioned issues, some 
> things are still left though:
> 
> - the txt files in the egg-info folder still exist
> - piuparts fails, but the leftover files seem not to be turtle package 
> related
> - "Package closes bugs in a wrong way" in the changelog
> 
> There is now a new upstream release 0.11.1 being used, so the title of 
> this bug report no longer matches. I hope this is fine.
> 
> Best regards,
> Philipp
> 
> 
> 

Hi Philipp,

The RFS bug should not be closed in the changelog. It will be closed when the
package is uploaded.

The bug that should be closed is an Intent To Package (ITP) bug. See links
below for reference and examples of how to create one.

https://wiki.debian.org/ITP

https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged

Once we have rectified this one, then we can look at the other issues.

P.S. Thank you for the coffees, much appreciated. All donations are gratefully
recieved.

Regards

Phil

-- 

Donations...

Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

--

"I play the game for the game’s own sake"

Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans

--

Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas

Website: https://kathenas.org

Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg

Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg

--

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #37 received at 1092093@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Philipp Unger <philipp.unger.1988@gmail.com>

To: 1092093@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFS: turtle/0.11-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 15:02:28 +0100

On Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:17:30 +0000 Phil Wyett 
<philip.wyett@kathenas.org> wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> The RFS bug should not be closed in the changelog. It will be closed 
when the
> package is uploaded.
>
> The bug that should be closed is an Intent To Package (ITP) bug. See 
links
> below for reference and examples of how to create one.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/ITP
>
> https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged
>
> Once we have rectified this one, then we can look at the other issues.
>
> P.S. Thank you for the coffees, much appreciated. All donations are 
gratefully
> recieved.
>
> Regards
>
> Phil
>
> --
>
> Donations...
>
> Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg
>
> --
>
> "I play the game for the game’s own sake"
>
> Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans
>
> --
>
> Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas

>

Hi Phil,

updated the changelog and it no longer gives the error. All the QA 
Information is now green on the package site.

Best regards

Message #42 received at 1092093@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Phil Wyett <philip.wyett@kathenas.org>

To: 1092093@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 1092093-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFS: turtle/0.11.1-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:33:27 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Control: tags -1 +confirmed

Philipp,

Preamble...

Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to
the Debian project.

This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to
improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no
obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon
information provided in the review.

Review...

1. Build:

  * pbuilder [1]: Good
  * sbuild [2]: Good

2. Lintian [3]: Good

3. Licenses [4]: Good

4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good

5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc]: Good

6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good

7. Install [No previous installs]: Good

8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A

Summary...

Great work and enthusiasm for the package that I am sure you will move forward
with its maintenance.

I believe 'turtle' is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian
Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload
if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution.

Please try the below on your packages...

[1] pbuilder:

  * Command: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc
  * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto.
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks

[2] sbuild:

  * Command: sbuild <PACKAGE>.dsc
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild

[3] lintian:

  * Command: lintian --display-info --verbose --fail-on error --info --pedantic
--show-overrides (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different
results, so be thorough.
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian

[4] lrc:

  * Command: lrc
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon

  Note: Please report false positives as bug reports against 'licenserecon'.

[5] reprotest

  * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto-
build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild
  * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/
  * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
  
Regards

Phil

-- 

Donations...

Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

--

"I play the game for the game’s own sake"

Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans

--

Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas

Website: https://kathenas.org

Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg

Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg

--

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #54 received at 1092093@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net>

To: 1092093@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Philipp Unger <philipp.unger.1988@gmail.com>

Subject: Re: RFS: turtle/0.11.1-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 21:29:26 +0100

On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:33:27 +0000 Phil Wyett <philip.wyett@kathenas.org> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> Control: tags -1 +confirmed
>
Hi Phillip,

I'd be willing to sponsor turtle.
A minot nitpick: not need to include a .gitignore in debian/,
better exclude those files globally. Look into https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild
to build without cluttering the builddir.

Let me know if you want to update it 0.12 first.

best,

werdahias

Message #59 received at 1092093@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Philipp Unger <philipp.unger.1988@gmail.com>

To: 1092093@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFS: turtle/0.11.1-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 01:07:11 +0100

Hi Matthias,

thank you so much!

I have uploaded a new package for version 0.12.1, the .gitignore is now 
removed.

Please let me know if you need anything else or if I can help in any way.

Best regards,
Philipp

Message #68 received at 1092093@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Philipp Unger <philipp.unger.1988@gmail.com>

To: 1092093@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFS: turtle/0.11.1-1 [ITP] -- Nautilus extension for turtle

Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 21:08:44 +0200

Hello everyone,

updated the package to the latest version: turtle 0.13-1.

Best regards,
Philipp

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.