Skip to content

materializationDataset is no longer needed to read from views or queries. #1345

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
davidrabinowitz merged 7 commits into from
Mar 15, 2025
Merged

materializationDataset is no longer needed to read from views or queries. #1345

davidrabinowitz merged 7 commits into from
Mar 15, 2025

Conversation

@davidrabinowitz
Copy link
Member

@davidrabinowitz davidrabinowitz commented Mar 13, 2025

No description provided.

@davidrabinowitz
Copy link
Member Author

davidrabinowitz commented Mar 13, 2025

/gcbrun

@davidrabinowitz davidrabinowitz requested a review from isha97 March 13, 2025 18:18
@davidrabinowitz davidrabinowitz self-assigned this Mar 13, 2025
isha97
isha97 reviewed Mar 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
@davidrabinowitz
Copy link
Member Author

davidrabinowitz commented Mar 14, 2025

/gcbrun

@davidrabinowitz davidrabinowitz requested a review from isha97 March 14, 2025 22:14
@davidrabinowitz
Copy link
Member Author

davidrabinowitz commented Mar 14, 2025

/gcbrun

@davidrabinowitz
Copy link
Member Author

davidrabinowitz commented Mar 14, 2025

/gcbrun

@davidrabinowitz davidrabinowitz merged commit a20c774 into GoogleCloudDataproc:master Mar 15, 2025
9 checks passed
@davidrabinowitz davidrabinowitz deleted the simpler-views branch March 15, 2025 04:10
@parthshyara
Copy link

parthshyara commented Mar 25, 2025

@davidrabinowitz @isha97
After upgrading to the latest version, our jobs are failing because we don't have the bigquery.tables.create permission on the dataset where the bigquery view exists. We were using this option to materialize in another dataset where we have the permission. Is there a workaround for this or can you please revert this change and keep it Optional instead?

@davidrabinowitz
Copy link
Member Author

davidrabinowitz commented Mar 25, 2025

I'm sorry about that. Please use version 0.42.0 while we work on a fix

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@isha97 isha97 isha97 approved these changes

Assignees

@davidrabinowitz davidrabinowitz

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@davidrabinowitz @parthshyara @isha97