Skip to content

style: unify spelling of OSC in code comments#1050

Merged
gdamore merged 1 commit intogdamore:mainfrom
CatsDeservePets:main
Apr 11, 2026
Merged

style: unify spelling of OSC in code comments#1050
gdamore merged 1 commit intogdamore:mainfrom
CatsDeservePets:main

Conversation

@CatsDeservePets
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@CatsDeservePets CatsDeservePets commented Apr 6, 2026 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

This PR unifies the spelling of OSC in comments to match the rest of the codebase. I noticed this because one comment used osc and did not show up when I searched for all occurrences of OSC. I found the other inconsistent spellings along the way.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal documentation and comments to improve consistency and clarity of technical details throughout the codebase.

@CatsDeservePets CatsDeservePets requested a review from gdamore as a code owner April 6, 2026 00:42
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: e421c9c2-4236-4772-9a2c-f616f84edafb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0387a59 and b09f434.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • input.go
  • tscreen.go
  • vt/backend.go
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Three comment-only updates clarifying OSC protocol documentation references across input handling, terminal screen, and backend modules. No functional or behavioral changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
OSC Protocol Documentation Clarifications
input.go, tscreen.go, vt/backend.go		 Comment updates to standardize OSC protocol references: updating "OSC-52"/"OSC2" naming conventions and clarifying OSC 9 argument support details. No functional code changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Comments cleaned, like burrows swept,
OSC protocols now kept,
Two to the dash, nine with one call—
Small fixes make the best of all! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'style: unify spelling of OSC in code comments' directly and accurately describes the main change—standardizing OSC spelling across code comments in three files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gdamore
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

gdamore commented Apr 6, 2026

I cannot promise I'll retain this consistency going forward.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.27%. Comparing base (0387a59) to head (b09f434).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1050   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.27%   86.27%           
=======================================
  Files          46       46           
  Lines        5057     5057           
=======================================
  Hits         4363     4363           
  Misses        537      537           
  Partials      157      157

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@gdamore gdamore merged commit 21c482b into gdamore:main Apr 11, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gdamore gdamore gdamore approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CatsDeservePets @gdamore