Skip to content

feat(eslint-plugin): add no-extra-semi [extension]#1237

Merged
bradzacher merged 8 commits into
typescript-eslint:masterfrom
a-tarasyuk:feature/no-extra-semi
Dec 19, 2019
Merged

feat(eslint-plugin): add no-extra-semi [extension]#1237
bradzacher merged 8 commits into
typescript-eslint:masterfrom
a-tarasyuk:feature/no-extra-semi

Conversation

@a-tarasyuk

@a-tarasyuk a-tarasyuk commented Nov 19, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #1167

Seems, MethodDefinition can be reused for ClassProperty.

@typescript-eslint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @a-tarasyuk!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitors per day.

@bradzacher bradzacher added the enhancement: new base rule extension New base rule extension required to handle a TS specific case label Nov 19, 2019

@bradzacher bradzacher left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly LGTM - two minor changes.
Thanks for this.

Comment thread packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-extra-semi.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/no-extra-semi.test.ts
@bradzacher bradzacher added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Dec 19, 2019
@bradzacher bradzacher removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Dec 19, 2019
@a-tarasyuk a-tarasyuk force-pushed the feature/no-extra-semi branch from a36b70c to 5b7f71e Compare December 19, 2019 06:25
bradzacher
bradzacher previously approved these changes Dec 19, 2019

@bradzacher bradzacher left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - thanks!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

enhancement: new base rule extension New base rule extension required to handle a TS specific case

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[no-extra-semi] False negative with class property

2 participants