Industry Analysis Techniques

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Dale Tutt

    Industry Strategy Leader @ Siemens, Aerospace Executive, Engineering and Program Leadership | Driving Growth with Digital Solutions

    8,339 followers

    After spending three decades in the aerospace industry, I’ve seen firsthand how crucial it is for different sectors to learn from each other. We no longer can afford to stay stuck in our own bubbles. Take the aerospace industry, for example. They’ve been looking at how car manufacturers automate their factories to improve their own processes. And those racing teams? Their ability to prototype quickly and develop at a breakneck pace is something we can all learn from to speed up our product development. It’s all about breaking down those silos and embracing new ideas from wherever we can find them. When I was leading the Scorpion Jet program, our rapid development – less than two years to develop a new aircraft – caught the attention of a company known for razors and electric shavers. They reached out to us, intrigued by our ability to iterate so quickly, telling me "you developed a new jet faster than we can develop new razors..." They wanted to learn how we managed to streamline our processes. It was quite an unexpected and fascinating experience that underscored the value of looking beyond one’s own industry can lead to significant improvements and efficiencies, even in fields as seemingly unrelated as aerospace and consumer electronics. In today’s fast-paced world, it’s more important than ever for industries to break out of their silos and look to other sectors for fresh ideas and processes. This kind of cross-industry learning not only fosters innovation but also helps stay competitive in a rapidly changing market. For instance, the aerospace industry has been taking cues from car manufacturers to improve factory automation. And the automotive companies are adopting aerospace processes for systems engineering. Meanwhile, both sectors are picking up tips from tech giants like Apple and Google to boost their electronics and software development. And at Siemens, we partner with racing teams. Why? Because their knack for rapid prototyping and fast-paced development is something we can all learn from to speed up our product development cycles. This cross-pollination of ideas is crucial as industries evolve and integrate more advanced technologies. By exploring best practices from other industries, companies can find innovative new ways to improve their processes and products. After all, how can someone think outside the box, if they are only looking in the box? If you are interested in learning more, I suggest checking out this article by my colleagues Todd Tuthill and Nand Kochhar where they take a closer look at how cross-industry learning are key to developing advanced air mobility solutions. https://lnkd.in/dK3U6pJf

  • View profile for Martijn Vos

    Global Aluminum Innovator

    7,402 followers

    📣 The era of aluminium surplus is over. 🛑 According to a powerful analysis by Andy Home at Reuters, the global aluminium market is "sleepwalking into the biggest deficits in 20 years." For decades, the market has been defined by excess, but a structural shift is underway. Here’s why: 🇨🇳 China is at Capacity: The world's largest producer (60% of global output) is hitting its government-mandated cap of 45 million tons per year. Their relentless production growth is grinding to a halt. 📉 Inventories are Draining: LME stocks have plummeted from over 3 million tons four years ago to just over 700,000 today. Sanctions are diverting Russian metal to China, further squeezing Western exchange liquidity. ⚡ The Energy Transition is a Double-Edged Sword: Demand is surging from solar and EV sectors, while high energy costs are stifling smelter restarts outside of China (e.g., closures threatened in Mozambique). 🇮🇩 New Supply Can't Keep Up: Hope rests on Indonesia, where Chinese companies are building new smelters. But analysts at Citi project new capacity will fall far short of expectations, reaching only 2.3M tons by 2030 due to high costs and energy challenges. The result? Citi analysts predict prices will need to rise sustainably above $3,000/metric ton (from ~$2,700 today) to prevent a shortage. This isn't just another trader squeeze; it's a fundamental reshaping of the market. The next crisis won't be caused by too much metal, but by too little. #Aluminium #Metals #Commodities #EnergyTransition #SupplyChain #Mining #Economy #Reuters 

  • View profile for Paul Wookey

    Executive Producer at Saracen Bridge. Entertainment investment PLEASE DON’T PITCH ME FILMS UNLESS THEY ARE FIT FOR FUNDING.

    19,945 followers

    🎬 How Film Investors Get Their Money Back One of the biggest misconceptions in filmmaking is that film investment is a gamble with no clear route to return. The truth is, smart film finance is built on structure, strategy, and multiple revenue streams. Here’s a quick look at how investors typically make their money back 👇 💰 1. Recoupment Waterfall After the film is sold or licensed, income flows through a “waterfall.” Investors are repaid first often with a premium (10–20%) before profits are shared with producers, sales agents, and talent. 🎟️ 2. Distribution Deals Films generate revenue from various platforms: theatrical releases, streaming (Netflix, Amazon, Apple), TV networks, airlines, and digital sales. Each territory or platform contributes to the investor’s recoupment pool. 🌍 3. Tax Incentives & Rebates Depending on the location, production rebates or tax credits can return 20–40% of qualified spend, effectively reducing the investor’s exposure right from day one. 📀 4. Ancillary & Merchandising Revenue Soundtracks, merchandise, product placement, and remake or format rights can all add to the revenue stack. 🎥 5. Long-Term Library Value A good film doesn’t stop earning once it’s released library sales, streaming royalties, and international syndication can continue generating income for years. 💼 Rough Example Breakdown — £5 Million Film Investment Total Budget: £5,000,000 1. Government Rebates (UK + EU): Approx. 30% return → £1,500,000 back within 6–12 months. 2. Pre-Sales & Distribution Advances: Agreements secured pre-release (domestic + international) → £2,000,000 returned during or soon after production. 3. Post-Release Revenue (Streaming, TV, etc.): Within 2 years of release, additional returns from: SVOD & TV licensing: £1,000,000 Ancillary rights & merchandise: £250,000 Library/royalty income (years 3–5): £500,000 Total Revenue: £5,250,000 ✅ Investor Recoups 100% + 5% premium (£5.25M) ✅ Ongoing profit participation on future library sales Film investment isn’t a lottery ticket it’s an asset-backed opportunity when structured correctly. The key is transparency, experienced producers, and a realistic route to market. When creative vision meets financial discipline, both art and investment thrive. #FilmFinance #Investing #FilmProduction #EntertainmentBusiness #Producers #CreativeInvestment

  • View profile for Jason Miller
    Jason Miller Jason Miller is an Influencer

    Supply chain professor helping industry professionals better use data

    64,390 followers

    One lesson from the past ~18 months of studying supply chain dynamics is the critical role that inventory right-sizing plays in shaping freight volumes. Perhaps the most negatively affected transportation market since mid-2022 has been air freight from Asia to the USA, where volumes year-to-date through September are down 22% from last year and 5% year-to-date from 2019. One reason for this has been that apparel wholesalers (NAICS 4243) have not only seen lower demand (https://lnkd.in/gNgsu8va), but they have been engaged in an extensive correction of their inventories. Two charts below showing these dynamics. Thoughts: •The top plot shows seasonally adjusted inventories to sales. As can be seen, inventories to sales started to explode upwards in mid-2022, suggesting dramatic over-ordering of inventories given where demand levels were. This ratio then hovered around 3.0 from July 2022 through July 2023, which is 36% higher than before COVID-19. However, August and September showed nice downward movements, with this ratio falling to 2.74 as of September. While still much higher than before COVID-19, this represents progress. •The bottom plot shows inflation adjusted inventories as an index where 100 = 2019. These peaked in Q4 2022 and have been steadily declining since then. As of September, inflation adjusted inventories had declined almost 20%. They are now just 7% above 2019 levels (note, they need to fall below 2019 levels for inventories to sales to reach 2019 levels because sales today are below 2019 levels). •To understand why inventory dynamics, in addition to demand dynamics matter, assume that in Q3 2022 these wholesalers sold 100 widgets. Inflation adjusted sales in Q3 2023 were down 10% from this level, so 90 widgets. In Q3 2022, real inventories rose 10% from Q2 2022, meaning these firms ordered ~103 widgets during this period. In contrast, real inventories declined 9% in Q3 2023 from Q2 2023. Therefore, they only ordered about 88 widgets. Thus, even though demand declined 10%, orders declined 15% in Q3 2023 from Q2 2022. Stated differently, orders in late 2021 and much of 2022 were inflated because of inventory accumulation, which is now resulting in a hangover in 2023 as inventories are corrected. Implication: for some sectors, we will likely need till mid-2024 for inventories to normalize. Some others (here is looking at you, alcoholic beverage wholesaling https://lnkd.in/gwHv2ZUR] may take even longer for inventories to get balanced relative to demand. #supplychain #supplychainmanagement #shipsandshipping #ecommerce #logistics    

  • View profile for Malte Karstan

    Top Retail Expert 2026-2025-2024 - RETHINK Retail | Keynote Speaker | C-Suite Advisor | E-Commerce Evangelist & Consultant | Investor in Stealth Mode | Podcast Co-Host

    72,410 followers

    📈 From Vinyl to Vertical Video: What This Chart Really Says About the Music Business This graphic is more than a nostalgia trip, more of a compressed MBA in the economics of recorded music. In one frame, you see five decades of the U.S. music industry reinventing itself under pressure: technology shifts, consumer behavior, pricing power, platform economics. Vinyl, 8-track, cassette, CD, downloads, ringtones, now streaming. While each format didn’t just replace the last one, it redefined the entire value chain. The CD era (mid-90s to early 2000s) represents peak monetization. High margins, physical scarcity, strong retail control, predictable demand. Labels like Sony Music Entertainment + Universal Music Group + Warner Music Group operated in a world where distribution was expensive and ownership was clear. Revenue peaked (adjusted for inflation) and then collapsed. Then came the digital shockwave. Napster didn’t just disrupt distribution, it reset consumer expectations. iTunes stabilized the market temporarily by unbundling albums into tracks, but downloads were a bridge, not a destination. Ringtones had their moment (briefly reminding everyone how powerful mobile monetization could be), while piracy hollowed out the middle. The real inflection point is streaming. Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music and YouTube didn’t simply „save” the industry, indeed they rebuilt it on an entirely new economic model. Access replaced ownership. Recurring revenue replaced one-time purchases. Data replaced intuition. Algorithms became A&R. Playlists became radio. Discovery moved from program directors to machine learning, social feeds and short-form video platforms like TikTok and Instagram (Meta). What’s especially important: revenue recovered, but power redistributed. Today, growth is driven by scale, catalog leverage, global reach and platform partnerships. Labels think like investment funds. Artists think like startups. DSPs operate like utilities with recommendation engines. Meanwhile, vinyl’s resurgence proves that formats don’t disappear, they get repositioned as premium, experiential products. This chart also mirrors what we’ve seen in film, fitness, publishing plus gaming. Think Netflix, Peloton Interactive, Substack, Epic Games. The pattern is consistent: fragmentation → collapse → platform consolidation → data-driven growth. The takeaway for anyone in media, tech or entertainment isn’t about music formats. But about adaptability. The companies that survived weren’t the ones who protected the old model, instead they were the ones who rebuilt their economics around how consumers actually behave. History doesn’t repeat, but business models definitely rhyme. Graphic by Chartr

  • View profile for Pieter Borsje

    Founder of Eona | AML Specialist | Allocated Gold Advocate

    17,463 followers

    The center of gravity in the metals world is shifting and Dubai just entered the game. This year’s London Metal Exchange Week wasn’t just another industry gathering. It was a strategic inflection point, a snapshot of how power in global metals is being redistributed. Dubai’s new role. Hong Kong Exchanges (HKEx) surprised the market by launching a pricing arm in Dubai. It’s not a side note it’s a deliberate move to link China’s metal ecosystem with the fast-growing Middle East. This positions Dubai as a bridgehead between East and West, strategically placed along new trade corridors. Smelters over mines. You don’t have security if you just have stuff in the ground, said Trafigura’s CEO. Control over processing capacity not just raw extraction is becoming the decisive factor in geopolitical metal strategy. Australia has already pledged A$135M to keep smelters alive. The West is realizing what China has mastered for decades, whoever controls the smelters, controls the flow. Copper leads the charge. Funds are shifting toward hard assets, inventories are tight, and tariffs are reshaping global trade flows. Codelco and Aurubis both raised their 2026 premiums to around $325/ton, a clear signal of scarcity and demand. Copper isn’t just a metal it’s a geopolitical pressure point. Aluminum’s unexpected turn. Veteran bears turned bullish. Analysts now expect aluminum to break the $3,000–$4,000/ton range. Why? China’s smelter capacity cap. For the first time in decades, the market fears a supply squeeze, not a glut. Germanium and critical minerals. “There is none.” China’s export restrictions on germanium have already triggered a global supply crunch. Gallium could be next. And now rare earths like holmium, erbium, thulium, europium, and ytterbium are entering the restricted list. Few have heard of them but they will shape tomorrow’s chip, energy, and defense industries. This isn’t just about price charts. It’s about who controls the chokepoints of the future economy. And this time, the story isn’t just China vs. the West it’s China and Dubai vs. the old order.

  • View profile for Cherie Hu
    Cherie Hu Cherie Hu is an Influencer

    Founder of Water & Music | Mapping the future of music and tech | Analyst, strategist, and consultant for forward-thinking music companies

    23,884 followers

    We're now three months into running Daily Music Data — our daily IG account at Water & Music, where we share at least one curated music industry data point every weekday with analysis on why it matters. Some clear themes have emerged in the kinds of insights that resonate the most with our 2,000+ followers. Below is an overview of the most popular stats we've shared so far, with some high-level takeaways that connect the dots: I. INDUSTRY POWER DYNAMICS 💡 By distribution ownership, the three major labels (Universal, Warner, Sony) control 84% of the recorded music market, with Universal leading at 39%. (Source: Billboard) 💡 Out of the 7M artists releasing music today, only 5% are signed to a record label. (Source: MIDiA Research) 💡 Warner Music Group reported $1.1B in total unrecouped advances to artists and songwriters in 2023 — a 26% increase from 2022. (Source: Warner Music Group 2023 Annual Report) 🔎 The story: While the vast majority of artists are operating independently, major labels still maintain a stronghold on overall market share, and on financing and distribution for the upper echelon of artists. II. FAN & CONSUMER BEHAVIOR 💡 82% of Gen Zs find out about new music through social media or UGC video sites — compared to just 33% from streaming service recommendations. (Source: Deloitte) 💡 47% of Gen Z report belonging to a fandom that no one they know personally is a part of. (Source: YouTube Culture & Trends Report) 💡 Spotify users have made 725M+ playlists so far in 2024 — already accounting for 9% of all user-curated playlists on the platform. (Source: Spotify) 🔎 The story: UGC is a primary driver of music discovery AND fandom today. Moreover, social media, not streaming, is now the leading indicator of music culture, which correlates with fandom becoming more fragmented and niche. III. STARTUPS & NEW TECH 💡 Out of the 20 largest music-tech funding rounds in history, only 4 happened after 2018, for NetEase Cloud Music, Epidemic Sound, DICE, and Suno. (Source: Crunchbase) 💡 Users of the music AI app Udio are generating an average of 864K new songs every single day. (Source: Udio / Bloomberg) 💡 League of Legends’ monthly Spotify listeners have grown over 8.5X in the last 5 years, from 2M in June 2019 to 17.5M in June 2024. (Source: Chartmetric) 🔎 The story: While the music-tech market has matured from a funding perspective, there are still ample opportunities to build new frontiers for music creation, distribution, and consumption, especially through intersections with adjacent areas of tech and entertainment like AI and gaming. Follow us on IG @dailymusicdata for more daily industry insights like these. Our team combs through 70+ unique data sources to pull out the stats and insights that really matter, in a format that you can digest in 2 minutes or less. #musicindustry #dailymusicdata #musicdata #musicbusiness #musicbiz #musictech

  • View profile for Joe Ngai
    Joe Ngai Joe Ngai is an Influencer
    142,623 followers

    Greetings from São Paulo, Brazil - where the next chapter of China’s global story is being written in Portuguese.   My driver picked me up in a BYD King hybrid (known in China as Destroyer 05). On the highway, he turned down the radio and said, unprompted: “I want to thank the Chinese people for bringing this car to Brazil. I am saving so much on gas. That money - I am spending it on my family now.”   I’ve read plenty of reports on China’s auto expansion in LatAm. That sentence told me more than any of them.   Brazil has quietly become BYD’s largest international market - from 260 vehicles sold here in 2022 to over 112,000 in 2025, consistently breaking into the top five auto brands in the country. But the numbers are almost beside the point. What struck me standing outside a BYD dealership in São Paulo was something harder to quantify: genuine affection and admiration. This isn’t a brand being tolerated. It’s being embraced.   A few things stood out:   🔹 Going abroad in search of margins A BYD Dolphin Mini sells for around US$24,000 here - more than double its price in China. And yet Brazilian consumers consider it extraordinary value. The involution in China has forced Chinese players to go abroad - for survival.   🔹 Go big or go home This is not a tentative export strategy. BYD took over a former Ford manufacturing complex in Bahia, retrofitting it into the largest EV hub in South America - committing massive capital, localizing production ahead of tariffs, and building proprietary fast-charging infrastructure nationwide.   🔹 The growth pains are very real Behind the sales charts are steep learning curves: complex labor union dynamics, construction delays from heavy seasonal rains, regulatory scrutiny. It is still early to declare victory.   🔹 Real localization The BYD in the photo next to me had a “blindado” sign on its window. Portuguese for bulletproof. A feature no domestic Chinese model carries - and one no market research deck would have predicted. Going global means adapting quickly to local realities.   The ambition and urgency of Chinese companies to globalize have never been higher. But the world they are entering does not reward speed alone. It rewards institutional patience, cultural humility, and the resilience to weather the operational and geopolitical headwinds.   It’s only the beginning. In the lot next door, I see the Great Wall Motor dealership. And a Geely dealership on the opposite side of the street.   We are only at the beginning of a ten-year trend. Watch this space.

  • View profile for John Parrino

    Principal & Executive Producer • Governance • Stewardship • Commercial Architecture

    14,492 followers

    FILM FINANCING AS AN ALTERNATIVE ASSET CLASS For family offices and private investors, independent film and television projects represent a sophisticated asset segment that combines intellectual property creation with structured recoupment models. The opportunity lies in understanding how capital moves through the financing stack and how risk and liquidity are managed at each stage. ⸻ EQUITY PARTICIPATION Equity represents ownership. Investors exchange capital for a share of the film’s revenue through theatrical sales, streaming, licensing, and catalog value. Capital remains at risk until recouped, but successful distribution can deliver outsized returns. Seasoned investors structure equity positions with first-position recoupment, executive producer credit, and defined backend participation to protect their upside. ⸻ DEBT FINANCING Debt provides a collateralized, income-based approach to film investment. Lenders underwrite loans against secured receivables such as pre-sales, distribution minimum guarantees, or transferable state tax credits. Interest and fees are repaid from contracted revenue streams, reducing exposure and positioning the loan as a form of asset-backed lending. Completion bonds further mitigate delivery risk and enhance capital security. ⸻ BRIDGE AND GAP FINANCING Bridge and gap facilities maintain production continuity between funding milestones. Bridge loans cover timing gaps before contracted funds clear, while gap loans secure the final portion of a budget not yet backed by confirmed collateral. These short-duration instruments are typically supported by unsold territories, pending tax incentives, or distribution receivables and offer premium yields reflecting execution sensitivity. ⸻ TAX CREDITS AND INCENTIVES Government-backed incentives act as soft-money equity. Credits can be monetized or factored upfront to provide immediate liquidity. Leading U.S. jurisdictions—Georgia, New Mexico, Louisiana, Ohio, and New York—remain competitive because of transparent, transferable credit programs and strong local-spend multipliers. ⸻ STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS AND BRAND INTEGRATION Corporate partnerships and product placement supply non-dilutive capital and marketing exposure. These relationships can offset production costs through co-branded campaigns, hospitality support, or in-kind value that enhances both the film’s visibility and investor return profile. ⸻ WHY IT MATTERS Film assets behave more like structured credit than speculative art. When professionally packaged—with bonded budgets, collateralized incentives, and diversified recoupment streams—they offer investors an alternative asset class capable of producing asymmetric upside within a disciplined, risk-managed framework.

  • View profile for Mukesh Singh

    Co- Founder - Equibee Capital | SME IPO & Pre IPO Funding | Equity & Capital Market | Startup & SME Investor | Incubating SMEs for IPO and beyond

    26,621 followers

    🎬 Movies are not just entertainment — they are structured investment opportunities The Indian film industry is quietly evolving into a capital-efficient business model with diversified revenue streams. The upcoming movie Dhurandhar is a great case study to understand ROI in movie business, much like evaluating any other growth asset. 📊 Capital Deployment (Approx.) • Total Production Budget (Both Parts): ₹250 Cr • Production Costs: ₹120 Cr • Marketing & Distribution: ₹75 Cr • Lead Actor Fees & Others: Balance Unlike earlier eras, a large portion of capital risk is front-loaded and de-risked even before theatrical release. 💰 Pre-Theatrical Monetisation (Risk Cushion) • OTT Streaming Rights: ₹150 Cr • Satellite Rights: ₹45 Cr • Music Rights: ₹18 Cr 👉 Total Locked-in Revenue (Pre-Release): ~₹213 Cr This means ~85% of capital is already recovered before box-office collections begin. 🎵 Music Copyrights & Royalty — The Underrated Asset Music rights don’t just generate one-time income: • Streaming royalties (Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music) • Reels & short-form content usage • Background scores for ads & events • Long-term IP monetisation Over 8–10 years, music IP alone can outperform fixed income returns, with near-zero incremental cost. 🎟️ Theatrical Upside = Pure Alpha • Projected Worldwide Gross: ₹1,000 Cr+ • Total Revenue Projection: ₹1,240 Cr+ Once pre-theatrical costs are covered, box office becomes high-margin upside, similar to operating leverage in scalable businesses. 📈 Investment Outcome • Net ROI: ~300% • Return Multiple: ~5x on invested capital This is not speculation — it’s structured cash-flow engineering using IP, distribution rights, and demand visibility. 🧠 Key Takeaway for Investors Movies today resemble: • IP-led businesses • Structured finance deals • Assets with annuity-like royalty income Just like SME & micro-cap investing, returns are driven by smart capital allocation, risk mitigation, and scalable distribution — not just star power. Entertainment is the product. IP is the asset. ROI is the outcome. #MovieBusiness #ROI #IntellectualProperty #MusicRoyalties #CapitalMarkets #InvestingInIndia #MediaAndEntertainment #AlternativeAssets #Bollywood #Indiacinema #Dhurandhar #movieinvestment

Explore categories